Skip to content
⌘K
Explore
Download
Docs
Sign in
Sign up
flagon-io
/
g1t
public
Star
0
Overview
Code
Issues
Pull requests
Workflows
Deployments
Insights
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Releases
Compare
85c083a0e4e4d65d3ccf1c8d9037372ed1075c21
g1t
/
workflows
/
.g1t
syntaqx
The runner's broker test reads the relayed answer's body as chunks: the proxy passes the body on as it reads it, so "got " and "hello" can arrive as two chunks, and looking for "got hello" in the raw bytes failed CI #166 on a correct answer.
85c083a
yesterday
History
..
workflows
..
workflows
A project can build with a workflow. Turning on **Build with a workflow** under Settings, Deployments installs a managed workflow named `g1t` that calls g1t's reusable deploy workflow (`g1t/workflows/.g1t/workflows/deploy.yml@v1`, published from `workflows/` by the actions release) with the project's settings, and pushes and pull requests then start it rather than a build of Deployments' own: the same previews and production, at the same addresses, reported as `g1t / deploy`, now the check of the workflow's job, listed on the Actions page with its runs and logs. A pull request from a fork runs it with a read-only token, as on GitHub, and still gets its preview without the project's build secrets: a read-only job token may open a preview build only from a run of a managed workflow. Fork pull requests run the repository's managed workflows too. Its jobs are Actions time, at cost plus 20% on g1t's machines and free on a self-hosted runner. A workflow named `g1t` in `.g1t/workflows/` takes its place. The deployments and Actions guides say so.
2d ago
