g1t/services/work/src/lifecycle.rs
| 1 | //! Seeing a pull request through. Once a g1t agent has made a change, g1t |
| 2 | //! takes each remaining step itself: waiting for the checks the |
| 3 | //! repository's workflows report on it, a review by another agent, sending |
| 4 | //! the author back to address a failed check (with what its jobs printed) |
| 5 | //! or the review, and catching up when the branch it would land on has |
| 6 | //! moved. It stops when the pull request meets everything the default |
| 7 | //! branch's protection requires, or when it has tried and a person has to |
| 8 | //! decide. |
| 9 | //! |
| 10 | //! This service decides what the next step is and claims it. The runner |
| 11 | //! service asks, on every event that could change the answer, and carries |
| 12 | //! the step out in a sandbox. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | use g1t_contracts::repos::{GetByIdArgs, Repo, RepoPath}; |
| 15 | use g1t_contracts::time::rfc3339; |
| 16 | use g1t_contracts::work::*; |
| 17 | use g1t_contracts::{FailureCode, Membership, Outcome, User, Viewer}; |
| 18 | use g1t_kit::now_ms; |
| 19 | use std::collections::HashMap; |
| 20 | |
| 21 | use serde::Deserialize; |
| 22 | use worker::Result; |
| 23 | use worker::wasm_bindgen::JsValue; |
| 24 | |
| 25 | use crate::Work; |
| 26 | use crate::reviews::{AGENT_ID, AGENT_NAME}; |
| 27 | use crate::statuses::{self, WorkflowFacts}; |
| 28 | use crate::rows::ValueRow; |
| 29 | |
| 30 | /// How long a claimed step is waited for before it may be taken again. |
| 31 | const REVIEW_MINUTES: u64 = 20; |
| 32 | const REVISION_MINUTES: u64 = 60; |
| 33 | const CATCH_UP_MINUTES: u64 = 30; |
| 34 | const MERGE_MINUTES: u64 = 2; |
| 35 | /// Who a merge made by a repository's settings is attributed to. Not an |
| 36 | /// account: `g1t` cannot be registered. |
| 37 | pub(crate) const POLICY_ACTOR_ID: &str = "g1t_policy"; |
| 38 | pub(crate) const POLICY_ACTOR_NAME: &str = "g1t"; |
| 39 | /// How much of a failed check's output the author is shown. |
| 40 | const MAX_CHECK_OUTPUT_CHARS: usize = 4_000; |
| 41 | /// How many failed jobs' logs the author is shown, and how much of each. |
| 42 | const MAX_FAILED_JOBS: usize = 3; |
| 43 | const MAX_JOB_LOG_CHARS: usize = 3_000; |
| 44 | /// The most pages of a job's log read to find its end. |
| 45 | const MAX_LOG_PAGES: usize = 6; |
| 46 | const MANAGED_PAGE: u32 = 200; |
| 47 | |
| 48 | /// The part of a pull request's row that tracks its lifecycle. |
| 49 | #[derive(Deserialize)] |
| 50 | struct Progress { |
| 51 | managed: u8, |
| 52 | revisions: u32, |
| 53 | revised_at: Option<String>, |
| 54 | working_on: Option<String>, |
| 55 | working_until: Option<String>, |
| 56 | stalled: Option<String>, |
| 57 | } |
| 58 | |
| 59 | /// A merge asked for while the pull request was behind, as stored. |
| 60 | #[derive(serde::Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 61 | #[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")] |
| 62 | struct LandRequest { |
| 63 | actor: User, |
| 64 | keep_issue_open: bool, |
| 65 | } |
| 66 | |
| 67 | #[derive(Deserialize)] |
| 68 | struct LandRow { |
| 69 | land_requested: Option<String>, |
| 70 | land_requested_at: Option<String>, |
| 71 | stalled: Option<String>, |
| 72 | } |
| 73 | |
| 74 | #[derive(Deserialize)] |
| 75 | struct FinishedReview { |
| 76 | finished_at: String, |
| 77 | verdict: Option<Verdict>, |
| 78 | } |
| 79 | |
| 80 | #[derive(Deserialize)] |
| 81 | struct ReviewNote { |
| 82 | body: String, |
| 83 | path: Option<String>, |
| 84 | line: Option<u32>, |
| 85 | } |
| 86 | |
| 87 | /// What the author is being sent back to address. |
| 88 | pub(crate) enum Feedback { |
| 89 | /// The merge queue took it out: its combined state failed. |
| 90 | FailedChecks, |
| 91 | /// Checks that failed on its head. |
| 92 | FailedWorkflows, |
| 93 | /// The review that finished at this time. |
| 94 | Review(String), |
| 95 | /// What a person who asked for changes wrote since the last revision. |
| 96 | Person(PersonRequest), |
| 97 | } |
| 98 | |
| 99 | /// A person's request for changes that still stands: their latest verdict, |
| 100 | /// made after the agent last revised. |
| 101 | #[derive(Clone, Debug, Deserialize)] |
| 102 | pub(crate) struct PersonRequest { |
| 103 | author_id: String, |
| 104 | author_name: String, |
| 105 | created_at: String, |
| 106 | } |
| 107 | |
| 108 | /// What should happen next, if it is g1t's turn. |
| 109 | pub(crate) enum Next { |
| 110 | /// A step is under way, or it is a person's turn. |
| 111 | Wait, |
| 112 | Review, |
| 113 | Revise(Feedback), |
| 114 | CatchUp, |
| 115 | /// Land it, because the repository says ready pull requests land. |
| 116 | Merge, |
| 117 | } |
| 118 | |
| 119 | /// Whether g1t made this pull request, and so sees it through. |
| 120 | pub(crate) fn made_by_g1t(pull: &Pull) -> bool { |
| 121 | pull.runtime == Runtime::Hosted && pull.agent == AGENT_NAME && pull.fork.is_some() |
| 122 | } |
| 123 | |
| 124 | fn at(stage: Stage, detail: impl Into<String>, revisions: u32) -> Lifecycle { |
| 125 | Lifecycle { |
| 126 | stage, |
| 127 | detail: detail.into(), |
| 128 | revisions, |
| 129 | } |
| 130 | } |
| 131 | |
| 132 | fn times(count: u32) -> String { |
| 133 | match count { |
| 134 | 1 => "once".to_owned(), |
| 135 | 2 => "twice".to_owned(), |
| 136 | count => format!("{count} times"), |
| 137 | } |
| 138 | } |
| 139 | |
| 140 | /// Everything the next step depends on. |
| 141 | struct Facts { |
| 142 | /// Still being made: not yet marked ready for review. |
| 143 | draft: bool, |
| 144 | /// Why g1t stopped, if it has. |
| 145 | stalled: Option<String>, |
| 146 | /// The step under way, if one was claimed and is still being waited for. |
| 147 | working_on: Option<String>, |
| 148 | /// `failed` when the merge queue took it out. |
| 149 | check_status: Option<CheckStatus>, |
| 150 | /// A review someone asked for is being written. |
| 151 | review_pending: bool, |
| 152 | revisions: u32, |
| 153 | /// The latest finished review of the change as it is now. |
| 154 | review: Option<FinishedReview>, |
| 155 | /// Whether the branch it would land on has moved without it. |
| 156 | behind: bool, |
| 157 | /// Whether it is known to conflict with the branch it would land on. |
| 158 | conflicting: bool, |
| 159 | /// Whether the repository lands a ready pull request by itself. |
| 160 | auto_merge: bool, |
| 161 | /// Whether the repository refuses to merge one that is behind. |
| 162 | require_up_to_date: bool, |
| 163 | /// Whether a second agent reviews it without being asked. |
| 164 | agent_review: bool, |
| 165 | /// How many times the author may be sent back. |
| 166 | max_revisions: u32, |
| 167 | /// What the repository's approval rule still wants, if anything. |
| 168 | approvals_missing: Option<String>, |
| 169 | /// A person asked for changes since the agent last revised. |
| 170 | person_request: Option<PersonRequest>, |
| 171 | /// Its place in the merge queue, and what is ahead of it there. |
| 172 | queued: Option<(QueueState, Vec<u32>)>, |
| 173 | /// What the checks on its head say, against the required ones. |
| 174 | workflows: WorkflowFacts, |
| 175 | /// Why the agent's change has low confidence, when the repository asks |
| 176 | /// a person before merging one and no person has approved it since. |
| 177 | low_confidence: Option<String>, |
| 178 | } |
| 179 | |
| 180 | /// Where a pull request stands, and the step to take if it is g1t's turn. |
| 181 | /// |
| 182 | /// The order is: nothing while a step is under way; a person asking for |
| 183 | /// changes is answered first; its checks must finish, and the required |
| 184 | /// ones pass; then a review must approve; then it must be up to date. A |
| 185 | /// person's or an agent's request for changes, or a failed check, sends the |
| 186 | /// author back, a limited number of times, after which a person is asked. |
| 187 | /// A check the branch does not require stops holding it once the |
| 188 | /// revisions run out. |
| 189 | fn decide(facts: Facts) -> (Lifecycle, Next) { |
| 190 | let revisions = facts.revisions; |
| 191 | let wait = |stage, detail: &str| (at(stage, detail, revisions), Next::Wait); |
| 192 | let exhausted = revisions >= facts.max_revisions; |
| 193 | |
| 194 | if facts.draft { |
| 195 | return wait(Stage::Working, "A g1t agent is making the change."); |
| 196 | } |
| 197 | if let Some(reason) = &facts.stalled { |
| 198 | return wait(Stage::NeedsYou, reason); |
| 199 | } |
| 200 | if let Some((state, ahead)) = &facts.queued { |
| 201 | let named = ahead.iter().map(|n| format!("#{n}")).collect::<Vec<_>>().join(", "); |
| 202 | let detail = match (state, ahead.is_empty()) { |
| 203 | (QueueState::Testing, true) => "In the merge queue: being tested on the default branch as it is.".to_owned(), |
| 204 | (QueueState::Testing, false) => { |
| 205 | format!("In the merge queue: being tested together with {named}, ahead of it.") |
| 206 | } |
| 207 | (QueueState::Passed, true) => "Passed in the merge queue. Landing.".to_owned(), |
| 208 | (QueueState::Passed, false) => { |
| 209 | format!("Passed in the merge queue together with {named}. It lands once they have.") |
| 210 | } |
| 211 | _ => "In the merge queue, waiting for its turn to be tested.".to_owned(), |
| 212 | }; |
| 213 | return wait(Stage::Queued, &detail); |
| 214 | } |
| 215 | match facts.working_on.as_deref() { |
| 216 | Some("revision") => { |
| 217 | return wait( |
| 218 | Stage::Revising, |
| 219 | "The agent is addressing what the checks or the review found.", |
| 220 | ); |
| 221 | } |
| 222 | Some("catch_up") => { |
| 223 | return wait( |
| 224 | Stage::CatchingUp, |
| 225 | "The agent is merging in the branch this will land on, which has moved.", |
| 226 | ); |
| 227 | } |
| 228 | Some("answer") => { |
| 229 | return wait( |
| 230 | Stage::Answering, |
| 231 | "The agent is answering what another agent asked it.", |
| 232 | ); |
| 233 | } |
| 234 | Some("merge") => return wait(Stage::Ready, "Merging."), |
| 235 | Some(_) => return wait(Stage::Reviewing, "A g1t agent is reviewing the change."), |
| 236 | None => {} |
| 237 | } |
| 238 | if facts.review_pending { |
| 239 | return wait(Stage::Reviewing, "A g1t agent is reviewing the change."); |
| 240 | } |
| 241 | // A person asked for changes: the agent makes them, as it would for a |
| 242 | // review it asked for, before anything else. |
| 243 | if let Some(request) = &facts.person_request { |
| 244 | if exhausted { |
| 245 | return wait( |
| 246 | Stage::NeedsYou, |
| 247 | &format!( |
| 248 | "{} asked for changes, and the agent has already revised {}.", |
| 249 | request.author_name, |
| 250 | times(revisions) |
| 251 | ), |
| 252 | ); |
| 253 | } |
| 254 | return ( |
| 255 | at( |
| 256 | Stage::Revising, |
| 257 | format!( |
| 258 | "{} asked for changes. The agent is being sent back to make them.", |
| 259 | request.author_name |
| 260 | ), |
| 261 | revisions, |
| 262 | ), |
| 263 | Next::Revise(Feedback::Person(request.clone())), |
| 264 | ); |
| 265 | } |
| 266 | |
| 267 | // The merge queue took it out: its change failed together with what |
| 268 | // was ahead of it. |
| 269 | match facts.check_status { |
| 270 | Some(CheckStatus::Failed) if exhausted => { |
| 271 | return wait( |
| 272 | Stage::NeedsYou, |
| 273 | &format!("It failed in the merge queue after the agent revised {}.", times(revisions)), |
| 274 | ); |
| 275 | } |
| 276 | Some(CheckStatus::Failed) => { |
| 277 | return ( |
| 278 | at( |
| 279 | Stage::Revising, |
| 280 | "It failed in the merge queue. The agent is being sent back to fix it.", |
| 281 | revisions, |
| 282 | ), |
| 283 | Next::Revise(Feedback::FailedChecks), |
| 284 | ); |
| 285 | } |
| 286 | Some(CheckStatus::Errored) => { |
| 287 | return wait(Stage::NeedsYou, "Its checks could not be run."); |
| 288 | } |
| 289 | _ => {} |
| 290 | } |
| 291 | |
| 292 | // Its checks: the agent fixes any that failed. Once it is out of |
| 293 | // revisions, only the checks the branch requires still hold it. |
| 294 | if !facts.workflows.failed.is_empty() { |
| 295 | let failed = statuses::list(&facts.workflows.failed); |
| 296 | let required = facts.workflows.required_failed(); |
| 297 | if !exhausted { |
| 298 | return ( |
| 299 | at( |
| 300 | Stage::Revising, |
| 301 | format!("{failed} failed. The agent is being sent back to fix it."), |
| 302 | revisions, |
| 303 | ), |
| 304 | Next::Revise(Feedback::FailedWorkflows), |
| 305 | ); |
| 306 | } |
| 307 | if !required.is_empty() { |
| 308 | return wait( |
| 309 | Stage::NeedsYou, |
| 310 | &format!( |
| 311 | "The required {} {} still {} after the agent revised {}.", |
| 312 | if required.len() == 1 { "check" } else { "checks" }, |
| 313 | statuses::list(&required), |
| 314 | if required.len() == 1 { "fails" } else { "fail" }, |
| 315 | times(revisions) |
| 316 | ), |
| 317 | ); |
| 318 | } |
| 319 | } |
| 320 | if !facts.workflows.pending.is_empty() { |
| 321 | return wait( |
| 322 | Stage::Checking, |
| 323 | &format!("Waiting for {} to finish.", statuses::list(&facts.workflows.pending)), |
| 324 | ); |
| 325 | } |
| 326 | let expected = facts.workflows.expected(); |
| 327 | if !expected.is_empty() { |
| 328 | return wait( |
| 329 | Stage::Checking, |
| 330 | &format!( |
| 331 | "Waiting for the required {} {} to report on its latest commit.", |
| 332 | if expected.len() == 1 { "check" } else { "checks" }, |
| 333 | statuses::list(&expected) |
| 334 | ), |
| 335 | ); |
| 336 | } |
| 337 | |
| 338 | // A second agent reviews it, unless the repository leaves review to people. |
| 339 | if facts.agent_review { |
| 340 | match facts.review { |
| 341 | None => { |
| 342 | return ( |
| 343 | at( |
| 344 | Stage::Reviewing, |
| 345 | "A g1t agent is about to review the change.", |
| 346 | revisions, |
| 347 | ), |
| 348 | Next::Review, |
| 349 | ); |
| 350 | } |
| 351 | Some(FinishedReview { verdict: None, .. }) => { |
| 352 | return wait(Stage::NeedsYou, "The review could not be completed."); |
| 353 | } |
| 354 | Some(FinishedReview { |
| 355 | verdict: Some(Verdict::RequestChanges), |
| 356 | .. |
| 357 | }) if exhausted => { |
| 358 | return wait( |
| 359 | Stage::NeedsYou, |
| 360 | &format!( |
| 361 | "The review still asks for changes after the agent revised {}.", |
| 362 | times(revisions) |
| 363 | ), |
| 364 | ); |
| 365 | } |
| 366 | Some(FinishedReview { |
| 367 | verdict: Some(Verdict::RequestChanges), |
| 368 | finished_at, |
| 369 | }) => { |
| 370 | return ( |
| 371 | at( |
| 372 | Stage::Revising, |
| 373 | "The review asked for changes. The agent is being sent back to make them.", |
| 374 | revisions, |
| 375 | ), |
| 376 | Next::Revise(Feedback::Review(finished_at)), |
| 377 | ); |
| 378 | } |
| 379 | Some(FinishedReview { |
| 380 | verdict: Some(Verdict::Approve), |
| 381 | .. |
| 382 | }) => {} |
| 383 | } |
| 384 | } |
| 385 | |
| 386 | // A conflict found ahead of time is resolved before anything else that |
| 387 | // is left: it could not merge, by a person or by the queue, until then. |
| 388 | if facts.conflicting { |
| 389 | return ( |
| 390 | at( |
| 391 | Stage::CatchingUp, |
| 392 | "It conflicts with the branch it will land on. The agent is merging that branch in and resolving the conflicts.", |
| 393 | revisions, |
| 394 | ), |
| 395 | Next::CatchUp, |
| 396 | ); |
| 397 | } |
| 398 | // Only where the repository insists is catching up a step of its own, |
| 399 | // followed by its checks again. Elsewhere it happens as part of merging. |
| 400 | if facts.behind && facts.require_up_to_date { |
| 401 | return ( |
| 402 | at( |
| 403 | Stage::CatchingUp, |
| 404 | "The branch it will land on has moved. The agent is catching up.", |
| 405 | revisions, |
| 406 | ), |
| 407 | Next::CatchUp, |
| 408 | ); |
| 409 | } |
| 410 | // The repository wants approvals this does not have yet: people's turn, |
| 411 | // so it is shown as needing someone, not as g1t still working. |
| 412 | if let Some(missing) = &facts.approvals_missing { |
| 413 | return wait(Stage::NeedsYou, missing); |
| 414 | } |
| 415 | // Everything else is met, but g1t is not sure of the change: a person |
| 416 | // decides, rather than auto-merge or the queue. |
| 417 | if let Some(reasons) = &facts.low_confidence { |
| 418 | return wait( |
| 419 | Stage::NeedsYou, |
| 420 | &format!( |
| 421 | "The agent's confidence in this change is low ({reasons}). This repository asks a person before merging it: approve it to let it land, or ask for changes." |
| 422 | ), |
| 423 | ); |
| 424 | } |
| 425 | if facts.auto_merge { |
| 426 | return ( |
| 427 | at( |
| 428 | Stage::Ready, |
| 429 | "Everything this repository asks for is met. Merging, as its settings say.", |
| 430 | revisions, |
| 431 | ), |
| 432 | Next::Merge, |
| 433 | ); |
| 434 | } |
| 435 | wait( |
| 436 | Stage::Ready, |
| 437 | if facts.behind { |
| 438 | "Ready to merge. Merging brings it up to date with the default branch first." |
| 439 | } else { |
| 440 | "Everything this repository asks for is met. Ready to merge." |
| 441 | }, |
| 442 | ) |
| 443 | } |
| 444 | |
| 445 | impl Work { |
| 446 | /// Where a pull request stands and what g1t does next, remembered so |
| 447 | /// lists can show it without working it out again. `None` for one g1t |
| 448 | /// is not seeing through. |
| 449 | pub(crate) async fn assess( |
| 450 | &self, |
| 451 | pull: &Pull, |
| 452 | issue: &Option<Issue>, |
| 453 | behind: bool, |
| 454 | ) -> Result<Option<(Lifecycle, Next)>> { |
| 455 | Ok(self |
| 456 | .assess_with_confidence(pull, issue, behind) |
| 457 | .await? |
| 458 | .map(|(lifecycle, next, _)| (lifecycle, next))) |
| 459 | } |
| 460 | |
| 461 | /// [`Self::assess`], with how sure g1t is of the change once the agent |
| 462 | /// has finished it. |
| 463 | pub(crate) async fn assess_with_confidence( |
| 464 | &self, |
| 465 | pull: &Pull, |
| 466 | issue: &Option<Issue>, |
| 467 | behind: bool, |
| 468 | ) -> Result<Option<(Lifecycle, Next, Option<Confidence>)>> { |
| 469 | let assessed = self.assess_now(pull, issue, behind).await?; |
| 470 | if let Some((lifecycle, _, _)) = &assessed { |
| 471 | self.remember(&pull.id, lifecycle).await?; |
| 472 | } |
| 473 | Ok(assessed) |
| 474 | } |
| 475 | |
| 476 | /// Saves where a pull request stands, for [`Self::remembered`]. |
| 477 | pub(crate) async fn remember(&self, pull_id: &str, lifecycle: &Lifecycle) -> Result<()> { |
| 478 | let stage = serde_json::to_value(lifecycle.stage)?; |
| 479 | self.db |
| 480 | .prepare("UPDATE pulls SET stage = ?, stage_detail = ? WHERE id = ?") |
| 481 | .bind(&[ |
| 482 | stage.as_str().unwrap_or_default().into(), |
| 483 | lifecycle.detail.as_str().into(), |
| 484 | pull_id.into(), |
| 485 | ])? |
| 486 | .run() |
| 487 | .await?; |
| 488 | Ok(()) |
| 489 | } |
| 490 | |
| 491 | async fn assess_now( |
| 492 | &self, |
| 493 | pull: &Pull, |
| 494 | // What done means is in its body, for the agent; the merge waits on |
| 495 | // the branch's required checks, not on the issue. |
| 496 | _issue: &Option<Issue>, |
| 497 | behind: bool, |
| 498 | ) -> Result<Option<(Lifecycle, Next, Option<Confidence>)>> { |
| 499 | if !pull.status.is_active() { |
| 500 | return Ok(None); |
| 501 | } |
| 502 | let Some(progress) = self |
| 503 | .db |
| 504 | .prepare( |
| 505 | "SELECT managed, revisions, revised_at, working_on, working_until, stalled |
| 506 | FROM pulls WHERE id = ?", |
| 507 | ) |
| 508 | .bind(&[pull.id.as_str().into()])? |
| 509 | .first::<Progress>(None) |
| 510 | .await? |
| 511 | .filter(|progress| progress.managed != 0) |
| 512 | else { |
| 513 | return Ok(None); |
| 514 | }; |
| 515 | let now = rfc3339(now_ms()); |
| 516 | let working_on = progress |
| 517 | .working_until |
| 518 | .as_deref() |
| 519 | .is_some_and(|until| until > now.as_str()) |
| 520 | .then(|| progress.working_on.clone().unwrap_or_default()); |
| 521 | let review = self |
| 522 | .db |
| 523 | .prepare( |
| 524 | "SELECT finished_at, verdict FROM review_runs |
| 525 | WHERE pull_id = ? AND finished_at IS NOT NULL ORDER BY id DESC LIMIT 1", |
| 526 | ) |
| 527 | .bind(&[pull.id.as_str().into()])? |
| 528 | .first::<FinishedReview>(None) |
| 529 | .await? |
| 530 | // A review of what the change was before its last revision says |
| 531 | // nothing about what it is now. |
| 532 | .filter(|review| { |
| 533 | progress |
| 534 | .revised_at |
| 535 | .as_deref() |
| 536 | .is_none_or(|revised| review.finished_at.as_str() >= revised) |
| 537 | }); |
| 538 | let settings = self.settings(&pull.repo_id).await?; |
| 539 | let workflows = WorkflowFacts::of( |
| 540 | &self.statuses(&pull.repo_id, pull.head_commit.as_deref()).await?, |
| 541 | &settings.required_checks, |
| 542 | ); |
| 543 | // Once the agent has finished the change: how sure g1t is of it, and |
| 544 | // whether that holds it for a person. |
| 545 | let (confidence, low_confidence) = if pull.status == PullStatus::Draft { |
| 546 | (None, None) |
| 547 | } else { |
| 548 | let review_comments = match &review { |
| 549 | Some(review) => self.review_comments(pull, &review.finished_at).await?, |
| 550 | None => 0, |
| 551 | }; |
| 552 | let confidence = self |
| 553 | .assess_confidence( |
| 554 | pull, |
| 555 | crate::confidence::Signals { |
| 556 | required: crate::confidence::RequiredSignal::of(&workflows.required), |
| 557 | queue_failed: pull.check_status == Some(CheckStatus::Failed), |
| 558 | revisions: progress.revisions, |
| 559 | agent_review: settings.agent_review, |
| 560 | review: review.as_ref().and_then(|review| review.verdict), |
| 561 | review_comments, |
| 562 | ..Default::default() |
| 563 | }, |
| 564 | ) |
| 565 | .await?; |
| 566 | let held = settings.hold_low_confidence |
| 567 | && confidence.level == ConfidenceLevel::Low |
| 568 | && !self.person_approved(pull, progress.revised_at.as_deref()).await?; |
| 569 | let reasons = held.then(|| confidence.reasons.join(", ")); |
| 570 | (Some(confidence), reasons) |
| 571 | }; |
| 572 | let (lifecycle, next) = decide(Facts { |
| 573 | draft: pull.status == PullStatus::Draft, |
| 574 | stalled: progress.stalled, |
| 575 | working_on, |
| 576 | check_status: pull.check_status, |
| 577 | review_pending: self.review_pending(&pull.id).await?, |
| 578 | revisions: progress.revisions, |
| 579 | review, |
| 580 | behind, |
| 581 | conflicting: self.conflicting_files(pull).await?.is_some(), |
| 582 | auto_merge: settings.auto_merge, |
| 583 | require_up_to_date: settings.require_up_to_date, |
| 584 | agent_review: settings.agent_review, |
| 585 | max_revisions: settings.max_revisions, |
| 586 | approvals_missing: self.approvals_gap(&settings, pull).await?, |
| 587 | person_request: self |
| 588 | .person_request(pull, progress.revised_at.as_deref()) |
| 589 | .await?, |
| 590 | queued: self.queued_entry(&pull.id).await?, |
| 591 | workflows, |
| 592 | low_confidence, |
| 593 | }); |
| 594 | Ok(Some((lifecycle, next, confidence))) |
| 595 | } |
| 596 | |
| 597 | /// The latest request for changes by a person other than the author, |
| 598 | /// if it is that person's latest verdict and came after the last |
| 599 | /// revision. |
| 600 | async fn person_request( |
| 601 | &self, |
| 602 | pull: &Pull, |
| 603 | revised_at: Option<&str>, |
| 604 | ) -> Result<Option<PersonRequest>> { |
| 605 | #[derive(Deserialize)] |
| 606 | struct Verdicts { |
| 607 | author_id: String, |
| 608 | author_name: String, |
| 609 | verdict: Verdict, |
| 610 | created_at: String, |
| 611 | } |
| 612 | let rows = self |
| 613 | .db |
| 614 | .prepare( |
| 615 | "SELECT author_id, author_name, verdict, created_at FROM comments |
| 616 | WHERE repo_id = ? AND number = ? AND verdict IS NOT NULL |
| 617 | AND author_id != ? AND author_id != ? |
| 618 | ORDER BY id", |
| 619 | ) |
| 620 | .bind(&[ |
| 621 | pull.repo_id.as_str().into(), |
| 622 | pull.number.into(), |
| 623 | pull.author.id.as_str().into(), |
| 624 | AGENT_ID.into(), |
| 625 | ])? |
| 626 | .all() |
| 627 | .await? |
| 628 | .results::<Verdicts>()?; |
| 629 | // Each person's latest verdict is the one that stands. |
| 630 | let mut latest: HashMap<String, Verdicts> = HashMap::new(); |
| 631 | for row in rows { |
| 632 | latest.insert(row.author_id.clone(), row); |
| 633 | } |
| 634 | Ok(latest |
| 635 | .into_values() |
| 636 | .filter(|row| row.verdict == Verdict::RequestChanges) |
| 637 | .filter(|row| revised_at.is_none_or(|revised| row.created_at.as_str() > revised)) |
| 638 | .max_by(|a, b| a.created_at.cmp(&b.created_at)) |
| 639 | .map(|row| PersonRequest { |
| 640 | author_id: row.author_id, |
| 641 | author_name: row.author_name, |
| 642 | created_at: row.created_at, |
| 643 | })) |
| 644 | } |
| 645 | |
| 646 | /// Marks a pull request a g1t agent has just opened as one g1t sees |
| 647 | /// through. |
| 648 | pub(crate) async fn manage(&self, pull: &Pull) -> Result<()> { |
| 649 | if !made_by_g1t(pull) { |
| 650 | return Ok(()); |
| 651 | } |
| 652 | self.db |
| 653 | .prepare("UPDATE pulls SET managed = 1 WHERE id = ?") |
| 654 | .bind(&[pull.id.as_str().into()])? |
| 655 | .run() |
| 656 | .await?; |
| 657 | Ok(()) |
| 658 | } |
| 659 | |
| 660 | /// Takes a step for a pull request, if nobody else has. One statement, |
| 661 | /// so that two callers cannot both take it. |
| 662 | pub(crate) async fn claim(&self, pull_id: &str, step: &str, minutes: u64, revising: bool) -> Result<bool> { |
| 663 | let now = now_ms(); |
| 664 | let revision = if revising { |
| 665 | ", revisions = revisions + 1, revised_at = ?1" |
| 666 | } else { |
| 667 | "" |
| 668 | }; |
| 669 | Ok(self |
| 670 | .db |
| 671 | .prepare(format!( |
| 672 | "UPDATE pulls SET working_on = ?2, working_until = ?3{revision} |
| 673 | WHERE id = ?4 AND status = 'open' AND stalled IS NULL |
| 674 | AND (working_until IS NULL OR working_until < ?1) |
| 675 | RETURNING id AS value" |
| 676 | )) |
| 677 | .bind(&[ |
| 678 | rfc3339(now).into(), |
| 679 | step.into(), |
| 680 | rfc3339(now + minutes * 60 * 1000).into(), |
| 681 | pull_id.into(), |
| 682 | ])? |
| 683 | .first::<ValueRow>(None) |
| 684 | .await? |
| 685 | .is_some()) |
| 686 | } |
| 687 | |
| 688 | /// What the author is told when sent back: the checks that failed and |
| 689 | /// what their failing jobs printed, why the merge queue took it out, or |
| 690 | /// the review and its comments on lines. |
| 691 | async fn feedback(&self, pull: &Pull, feedback: &Feedback) -> Result<String> { |
| 692 | match feedback { |
| 693 | Feedback::FailedChecks => { |
| 694 | let run = self.latest_checks(&pull.id).await?; |
| 695 | // Why it failed, when that is more than a list of commands: |
| 696 | // the merge queue saying what broke in the combined state. |
| 697 | let why = run.as_ref().and_then(|run| run.error.clone()).map(|error| format!("{error}\n\n")).unwrap_or_default(); |
| 698 | let failed: Vec<String> = run |
| 699 | .map(|run| run.results) |
| 700 | .unwrap_or_default() |
| 701 | .into_iter() |
| 702 | .filter(|result| !result.passed) |
| 703 | .map(|result| { |
| 704 | let length = result.output.chars().count(); |
| 705 | let output: String = result |
| 706 | .output |
| 707 | .chars() |
| 708 | .skip(length.saturating_sub(MAX_CHECK_OUTPUT_CHARS)) |
| 709 | .collect(); |
| 710 | let exit = result |
| 711 | .exit_code |
| 712 | .map_or("it was stopped for taking too long".to_owned(), |code| { |
| 713 | format!("exit code {code}") |
| 714 | }); |
| 715 | format!("`{}` failed ({exit}):\n\n{}", result.command, output.trim()) |
| 716 | }) |
| 717 | .collect(); |
| 718 | if failed.is_empty() { |
| 719 | return Ok(format!( |
| 720 | "{why}Find the cause, fix it in your change, and push. Use get_workflow_run and get_job_logs for any workflow named above." |
| 721 | )); |
| 722 | } |
| 723 | Ok(format!( |
| 724 | "{why}These commands failed against your change.\n\n{}", |
| 725 | failed.join("\n\n") |
| 726 | )) |
| 727 | } |
| 728 | Feedback::FailedWorkflows => { |
| 729 | let (statuses, settings) = futures_util::future::try_join( |
| 730 | self.statuses(&pull.repo_id, pull.head_commit.as_deref()), |
| 731 | self.settings(&pull.repo_id), |
| 732 | ) |
| 733 | .await?; |
| 734 | let required = |context: &str| { |
| 735 | let name = g1t_contracts::work::check_name(context).0; |
| 736 | settings.required_checks.iter().any(|wanted| wanted.eq_ignore_ascii_case(name)) |
| 737 | }; |
| 738 | let failing: Vec<&CommitStatus> = |
| 739 | statuses.iter().filter(|s| s.state == "failure" || s.state == "error").collect(); |
| 740 | let failed: Vec<String> = failing |
| 741 | .iter() |
| 742 | .map(|s| { |
| 743 | let run = s.target_url.as_deref().and_then(|url| url.rsplit('/').next()).unwrap_or_default(); |
| 744 | format!( |
| 745 | "- {}{} ({}): run `{run}`, {}", |
| 746 | s.context, |
| 747 | if required(&s.context) { ", required to merge" } else { "" }, |
| 748 | s.description.as_deref().unwrap_or("failed"), |
| 749 | s.target_url.as_deref().unwrap_or_default() |
| 750 | ) |
| 751 | }) |
| 752 | .collect(); |
| 753 | let logs = self.failing_logs(pull, &failing).await.unwrap_or_default(); |
| 754 | // Named outright: the agent cannot guess it from its fork. |
| 755 | let repo = g1t_kit::call::<_, Option<RepoPath>>( |
| 756 | &self.repos, |
| 757 | "path_by_id", |
| 758 | &g1t_contracts::repos::PathByIdArgs { id: pull.repo_id.clone() }, |
| 759 | ) |
| 760 | .await? |
| 761 | .map(|path| format!("{}/{}", path.namespace, path.name)) |
| 762 | .unwrap_or_default(); |
| 763 | let logs = if logs.is_empty() { |
| 764 | String::new() |
| 765 | } else { |
| 766 | format!("\n\nThe end of what the failing jobs printed:\n\n{}", logs.join("\n\n")) |
| 767 | }; |
| 768 | Ok(format!( |
| 769 | "These checks failed on your latest commit to {repo}. They are the repository's workflows, run on your pull request:\n\n{}{logs}\n\n\ |
| 770 | For more, use the `get_workflow_run` tool (repo `{repo}` and the run's id), \ |
| 771 | then `get_job_logs` for the job that failed. Fix the cause in the code, not the workflow, \ |
| 772 | unless the workflow itself is wrong. Push, and the checks run again.", |
| 773 | failed.join("\n") |
| 774 | )) |
| 775 | } |
| 776 | Feedback::Review(finished_at) => { |
| 777 | // Everything a review says is recorded at the moment it finished. |
| 778 | let notes = self |
| 779 | .db |
| 780 | .prepare( |
| 781 | "SELECT body, path, line FROM comments |
| 782 | WHERE repo_id = ? AND number = ? AND author_id = ? AND created_at = ? |
| 783 | ORDER BY id", |
| 784 | ) |
| 785 | .bind(&[ |
| 786 | pull.repo_id.as_str().into(), |
| 787 | pull.number.into(), |
| 788 | AGENT_ID.into(), |
| 789 | finished_at.as_str().into(), |
| 790 | ])? |
| 791 | .all() |
| 792 | .await? |
| 793 | .results::<ReviewNote>()?; |
| 794 | let mut on_lines = Vec::new(); |
| 795 | let mut summary = String::new(); |
| 796 | for note in notes { |
| 797 | match (note.path, note.line) { |
| 798 | (Some(path), Some(line)) => { |
| 799 | on_lines.push(format!("- `{path}` line {line}: {}", note.body)); |
| 800 | } |
| 801 | (Some(path), None) => on_lines.push(format!("- `{path}`: {}", note.body)), |
| 802 | (None, _) => summary = note.body, |
| 803 | } |
| 804 | } |
| 805 | let mut text = format!( |
| 806 | "Another agent reviewed your change and asked for changes.\n\n{summary}" |
| 807 | ); |
| 808 | if !on_lines.is_empty() { |
| 809 | text.push_str("\n\nIts comments on lines:\n"); |
| 810 | text.push_str(&on_lines.join("\n")); |
| 811 | } |
| 812 | Ok(text) |
| 813 | } |
| 814 | Feedback::Person(request) => { |
| 815 | // What they wrote since the agent last revised, which their |
| 816 | // request for changes closes. |
| 817 | let revised: Option<String> = self |
| 818 | .db |
| 819 | .prepare("SELECT revised_at AS value FROM pulls WHERE id = ?") |
| 820 | .bind(&[pull.id.as_str().into()])? |
| 821 | .first::<Option<String>>(Some("value")) |
| 822 | .await? |
| 823 | .flatten(); |
| 824 | let notes = self |
| 825 | .db |
| 826 | .prepare( |
| 827 | "SELECT body, path, line FROM comments |
| 828 | WHERE repo_id = ? AND number = ? AND author_id = ? |
| 829 | AND created_at > ? AND created_at <= ? |
| 830 | ORDER BY id", |
| 831 | ) |
| 832 | .bind(&[ |
| 833 | pull.repo_id.as_str().into(), |
| 834 | pull.number.into(), |
| 835 | request.author_id.as_str().into(), |
| 836 | revised.unwrap_or_default().into(), |
| 837 | request.created_at.as_str().into(), |
| 838 | ])? |
| 839 | .all() |
| 840 | .await? |
| 841 | .results::<ReviewNote>()?; |
| 842 | let mut on_lines = Vec::new(); |
| 843 | let mut said = Vec::new(); |
| 844 | for note in notes { |
| 845 | match (note.path, note.line) { |
| 846 | (Some(path), Some(line)) => { |
| 847 | on_lines.push(format!("- `{path}` line {line}: {}", note.body)); |
| 848 | } |
| 849 | (Some(path), None) => on_lines.push(format!("- `{path}`: {}", note.body)), |
| 850 | (None, _) => said.push(note.body), |
| 851 | } |
| 852 | } |
| 853 | let mut text = format!( |
| 854 | "{} reviewed your change and asked for changes.\n\n{}", |
| 855 | request.author_name, |
| 856 | said.join("\n\n") |
| 857 | ); |
| 858 | if !on_lines.is_empty() { |
| 859 | text.push_str("\n\nTheir comments on lines:\n"); |
| 860 | text.push_str(&on_lines.join("\n")); |
| 861 | } |
| 862 | Ok(text) |
| 863 | } |
| 864 | } |
| 865 | } |
| 866 | |
| 867 | /// The end of what the failed jobs of failing workflow runs printed, a |
| 868 | /// few jobs at most, for an agent sent back to fix them. Empty where the |
| 869 | /// runs or their logs cannot be read. |
| 870 | async fn failing_logs(&self, pull: &Pull, failing: &[&CommitStatus]) -> Result<Vec<String>> { |
| 871 | use g1t_contracts::actions::{JobLog, LogsArgs, RunArgs, RunDetail}; |
| 872 | let Some(repo) = g1t_kit::call::<_, Option<RepoPath>>( |
| 873 | &self.repos, |
| 874 | "path_by_id", |
| 875 | &g1t_contracts::repos::PathByIdArgs { id: pull.repo_id.clone() }, |
| 876 | ) |
| 877 | .await? |
| 878 | else { |
| 879 | return Ok(Vec::new()); |
| 880 | }; |
| 881 | let viewer = self.author_viewer(pull).await?; |
| 882 | let mut out = Vec::new(); |
| 883 | for status in failing { |
| 884 | let Some(run_id) = status |
| 885 | .target_url |
| 886 | .as_deref() |
| 887 | .and_then(|url| url.split("/actions/runs/").nth(1)) |
| 888 | .map(|rest| rest.split(['/', '?', '#']).next().unwrap_or_default().to_owned()) |
| 889 | .filter(|id| !id.is_empty()) |
| 890 | else { |
| 891 | continue; |
| 892 | }; |
| 893 | let detail: Outcome<RunDetail> = g1t_kit::call( |
| 894 | &self.actions, |
| 895 | "run", |
| 896 | &RunArgs { repo: repo.clone(), viewer: viewer.clone(), id: run_id }, |
| 897 | ) |
| 898 | .await?; |
| 899 | let Outcome::Ok(detail) = detail else { continue }; |
| 900 | let failed_jobs = detail.jobs.into_iter().filter(|job| { |
| 901 | job.status == "completed" && matches!(job.conclusion.as_deref(), Some("failure" | "timed_out")) |
| 902 | }); |
| 903 | for job in failed_jobs { |
| 904 | if out.len() >= MAX_FAILED_JOBS { |
| 905 | return Ok(out); |
| 906 | } |
| 907 | let mut text = String::new(); |
| 908 | let mut after = 0; |
| 909 | for _ in 0..MAX_LOG_PAGES { |
| 910 | let page: Outcome<JobLog> = g1t_kit::call( |
| 911 | &self.actions, |
| 912 | "logs", |
| 913 | &LogsArgs { repo: repo.clone(), viewer: viewer.clone(), job: job.id.clone(), after }, |
| 914 | ) |
| 915 | .await?; |
| 916 | let Outcome::Ok(page) = page else { break }; |
| 917 | let Some(last) = page.chunks.last().map(|chunk| chunk.seq) else { break }; |
| 918 | for chunk in &page.chunks { |
| 919 | text.push_str(&chunk.text); |
| 920 | if !chunk.text.ends_with('\n') { |
| 921 | text.push('\n'); |
| 922 | } |
| 923 | } |
| 924 | // Only the end is kept, so the start can go as it is read. |
| 925 | let length = text.chars().count(); |
| 926 | if length > MAX_JOB_LOG_CHARS * 2 { |
| 927 | text = text.chars().skip(length - MAX_JOB_LOG_CHARS).collect(); |
| 928 | } |
| 929 | after = last; |
| 930 | if page.chunks.len() < 500 { |
| 931 | break; |
| 932 | } |
| 933 | } |
| 934 | let length = text.chars().count(); |
| 935 | let tail: String = text.chars().skip(length.saturating_sub(MAX_JOB_LOG_CHARS)).collect(); |
| 936 | if !tail.trim().is_empty() { |
| 937 | out.push(format!("{} / {}:\n```\n{}\n```", status.context, job.name, tail.trim_end())); |
| 938 | } |
| 939 | } |
| 940 | } |
| 941 | Ok(out) |
| 942 | } |
| 943 | |
| 944 | pub(crate) async fn advance(&self, a: AdvanceArgs) -> Result<Advance> { |
| 945 | let Some(pull) = self.pull_by_id(&a.pull_id).await? else { |
| 946 | return Ok(Advance::None); |
| 947 | }; |
| 948 | if pull.status != PullStatus::Open { |
| 949 | return Ok(Advance::None); |
| 950 | } |
| 951 | // As a member: a private repository would look missing otherwise, |
| 952 | // and the pull request would never move. |
| 953 | let viewer: Viewer = self.author_viewer(&pull).await?; |
| 954 | let repo: Outcome<Repo> = g1t_kit::call( |
| 955 | &self.repos, |
| 956 | "get_by_id", |
| 957 | &GetByIdArgs { |
| 958 | id: pull.repo_id.clone(), |
| 959 | viewer, |
| 960 | }, |
| 961 | ) |
| 962 | .await?; |
| 963 | let (Outcome::Ok(repo), Some(source)) = (crate::retired::unless_archived(repo), pull.fork.clone()) else { |
| 964 | return Ok(Advance::None); |
| 965 | }; |
| 966 | let issue = match pull.issue { |
| 967 | Some(number) => self.issue(&pull.repo_id, number).await?, |
| 968 | None => None, |
| 969 | }; |
| 970 | let behind = self.is_behind(&repo.id, &pull).await?; |
| 971 | let Some((lifecycle, next)) = self.assess(&pull, &issue, behind).await? else { |
| 972 | return Ok(Advance::None); |
| 973 | }; |
| 974 | |
| 975 | if matches!(next, Next::Merge) { |
| 976 | self.merge_by_policy(&repo, &pull).await?; |
| 977 | return Ok(Advance::None); |
| 978 | } |
| 979 | let (step, minutes) = match &next { |
| 980 | Next::Wait | Next::Merge => return Ok(Advance::None), |
| 981 | Next::Review => ("review", REVIEW_MINUTES), |
| 982 | Next::Revise(_) => ("revision", REVISION_MINUTES), |
| 983 | Next::CatchUp => ("catch_up", CATCH_UP_MINUTES), |
| 984 | }; |
| 985 | let feedback = match &next { |
| 986 | Next::Revise(feedback) => self.feedback(&pull, feedback).await?, |
| 987 | Next::CatchUp => self.conflict_note(&pull, &repo.default_branch).await?, |
| 988 | _ => String::new(), |
| 989 | }; |
| 990 | if !self |
| 991 | .claim(&pull.id, step, minutes, matches!(next, Next::Revise(_))) |
| 992 | .await? |
| 993 | { |
| 994 | return Ok(Advance::None); |
| 995 | } |
| 996 | // Said in the conversation, so nobody has to wonder why a review or |
| 997 | // a new commit appeared. |
| 998 | let told = match &next { |
| 999 | Next::Review => { |
| 1000 | self.db |
| 1001 | .prepare( |
| 1002 | "UPDATE pulls SET reviewers = json_insert(reviewers, '$[#]', ?1) |
| 1003 | WHERE id = ?2 AND NOT EXISTS ( |
| 1004 | SELECT 1 FROM json_each(pulls.reviewers) WHERE json_each.value = ?1)", |
| 1005 | ) |
| 1006 | .bind(&[AGENT_NAME.into(), pull.id.as_str().into()])? |
| 1007 | .run() |
| 1008 | .await?; |
| 1009 | "requested a review from g1t-agent".to_owned() |
| 1010 | } |
| 1011 | Next::Revise(Feedback::FailedChecks) => { |
| 1012 | "sent g1t-agent back to fix what failed in the merge queue".to_owned() |
| 1013 | } |
| 1014 | Next::Revise(Feedback::FailedWorkflows) => { |
| 1015 | "sent g1t-agent back to fix the failed checks".to_owned() |
| 1016 | } |
| 1017 | Next::Revise(Feedback::Review(_)) => { |
| 1018 | "sent g1t-agent back to address the review".to_owned() |
| 1019 | } |
| 1020 | _ => format!( |
| 1021 | "asked g1t-agent to bring this up to date with {}", |
| 1022 | repo.default_branch |
| 1023 | ), |
| 1024 | }; |
| 1025 | self.note( |
| 1026 | &pull.repo_id, |
| 1027 | pull.number, |
| 1028 | (POLICY_ACTOR_ID, POLICY_ACTOR_NAME), |
| 1029 | &told, |
| 1030 | ) |
| 1031 | .await?; |
| 1032 | let job = LifecycleJob { |
| 1033 | pull_id: pull.id, |
| 1034 | repo: RepoPath { |
| 1035 | namespace: repo.namespace, |
| 1036 | name: repo.name, |
| 1037 | }, |
| 1038 | number: pull.number, |
| 1039 | author: pull.author, |
| 1040 | source, |
| 1041 | branch: None, |
| 1042 | default_branch: repo.default_branch, |
| 1043 | title: pull.title, |
| 1044 | description: pull.body.unwrap_or_default(), |
| 1045 | issue, |
| 1046 | feedback, |
| 1047 | round: lifecycle.revisions + 1, |
| 1048 | }; |
| 1049 | Ok(match next { |
| 1050 | Next::Review => Advance::Review { job }, |
| 1051 | Next::Revise(_) => Advance::Revise { job }, |
| 1052 | Next::CatchUp => Advance::CatchUp { job }, |
| 1053 | Next::Wait | Next::Merge => Advance::None, |
| 1054 | }) |
| 1055 | } |
| 1056 | |
| 1057 | /// Lands a pull request that is ready, on the authority of the |
| 1058 | /// repository's settings instead of a person's click. |
| 1059 | async fn merge_by_policy(&self, repo: &Repo, pull: &Pull) -> Result<()> { |
| 1060 | if !self.claim(&pull.id, "merge", MERGE_MINUTES, false).await? { |
| 1061 | return Ok(()); |
| 1062 | } |
| 1063 | // g1t acts for the workspace whose members turned this on, with the |
| 1064 | // default base permission (Write), which merging needs. |
| 1065 | let actor = User { |
| 1066 | id: POLICY_ACTOR_ID.to_owned(), |
| 1067 | username: POLICY_ACTOR_NAME.to_owned(), |
| 1068 | verified: true, |
| 1069 | workspaces: vec![Membership::member(repo.namespace.to_lowercase())], |
| 1070 | ..User::default() |
| 1071 | }; |
| 1072 | let merged = self |
| 1073 | .merge_pull(PullActionArgs { |
| 1074 | actor, |
| 1075 | repo: RepoPath { |
| 1076 | namespace: repo.namespace.clone(), |
| 1077 | name: repo.name.clone(), |
| 1078 | }, |
| 1079 | number: pull.number, |
| 1080 | summary: String::new(), |
| 1081 | keep_issue_open: false, |
| 1082 | ignore_checks: false, |
| 1083 | }) |
| 1084 | .await?; |
| 1085 | match merged { |
| 1086 | Outcome::Ok(_) => Ok(()), |
| 1087 | // Most likely the branch moved in the moment between: let go, and |
| 1088 | // the next look at it will catch up and try again. |
| 1089 | Outcome::Fail(failure) if failure.code == FailureCode::Conflict => { |
| 1090 | self.db |
| 1091 | .prepare( |
| 1092 | "UPDATE pulls SET working_on = NULL, working_until = NULL |
| 1093 | WHERE id = ? AND working_on = 'merge'", |
| 1094 | ) |
| 1095 | .bind(&[pull.id.as_str().into()])? |
| 1096 | .run() |
| 1097 | .await?; |
| 1098 | Ok(()) |
| 1099 | } |
| 1100 | Outcome::Fail(failure) => { |
| 1101 | self.stall(StallArgs { |
| 1102 | pull_id: pull.id.clone(), |
| 1103 | reason: format!("g1t could not merge this: {}", failure.message), |
| 1104 | }) |
| 1105 | .await?; |
| 1106 | Ok(()) |
| 1107 | } |
| 1108 | } |
| 1109 | } |
| 1110 | |
| 1111 | /// Records that a merge was asked for while the pull request was |
| 1112 | /// behind, and announces it so that the runner brings it up to date. |
| 1113 | pub(crate) async fn request_landing( |
| 1114 | &self, |
| 1115 | pull: &Pull, |
| 1116 | actor: &User, |
| 1117 | keep_issue_open: bool, |
| 1118 | ) -> Result<()> { |
| 1119 | let now = now_ms(); |
| 1120 | let request = serde_json::to_string(&LandRequest { |
| 1121 | actor: actor.clone(), |
| 1122 | keep_issue_open, |
| 1123 | })?; |
| 1124 | self.db |
| 1125 | .prepare( |
| 1126 | "UPDATE pulls |
| 1127 | SET land_requested = ?, land_requested_at = ?, stalled = NULL, |
| 1128 | working_on = 'catch_up', working_until = ? |
| 1129 | WHERE id = ?", |
| 1130 | ) |
| 1131 | .bind(&[ |
| 1132 | request.into(), |
| 1133 | rfc3339(now).into(), |
| 1134 | rfc3339(now + CATCH_UP_MINUTES * 60 * 1000).into(), |
| 1135 | pull.id.as_str().into(), |
| 1136 | ])? |
| 1137 | .run() |
| 1138 | .await?; |
| 1139 | self.publish( |
| 1140 | "pull.merge_requested", |
| 1141 | &pull.repo_id, |
| 1142 | actor, |
| 1143 | Self::pull_event(pull), |
| 1144 | ) |
| 1145 | .await |
| 1146 | } |
| 1147 | |
| 1148 | /// The merge waiting on a pull request, if one was asked for recently |
| 1149 | /// enough to still stand. |
| 1150 | async fn land_request(&self, pull_id: &str) -> Result<Option<LandRequest>> { |
| 1151 | let row = self |
| 1152 | .db |
| 1153 | .prepare("SELECT land_requested, land_requested_at, stalled FROM pulls WHERE id = ?") |
| 1154 | .bind(&[pull_id.into()])? |
| 1155 | .first::<LandRow>(None) |
| 1156 | .await?; |
| 1157 | let oldest = rfc3339(now_ms().saturating_sub(CATCH_UP_MINUTES * 60 * 1000)); |
| 1158 | Ok(row |
| 1159 | .filter(|row| { |
| 1160 | row.land_requested_at |
| 1161 | .as_deref() |
| 1162 | .is_some_and(|at| at >= oldest.as_str()) |
| 1163 | }) |
| 1164 | .and_then(|row| row.land_requested) |
| 1165 | .and_then(|request| serde_json::from_str(&request).ok())) |
| 1166 | } |
| 1167 | |
| 1168 | /// Whether a merge is waiting on a pull request, and why g1t stopped |
| 1169 | /// working on it if it did. |
| 1170 | pub(crate) async fn landing_state(&self, pull_id: &str) -> Result<(bool, Option<String>)> { |
| 1171 | let stalled = self |
| 1172 | .db |
| 1173 | .prepare("SELECT land_requested, land_requested_at, stalled FROM pulls WHERE id = ?") |
| 1174 | .bind(&[pull_id.into()])? |
| 1175 | .first::<LandRow>(None) |
| 1176 | .await? |
| 1177 | .and_then(|row| row.stalled); |
| 1178 | Ok((self.land_request(pull_id).await?.is_some(), stalled)) |
| 1179 | } |
| 1180 | |
| 1181 | async fn forget_landing(&self, pull_id: &str) -> Result<()> { |
| 1182 | self.db |
| 1183 | .prepare( |
| 1184 | "UPDATE pulls SET land_requested = NULL, land_requested_at = NULL WHERE id = ?", |
| 1185 | ) |
| 1186 | .bind(&[pull_id.into()])? |
| 1187 | .run() |
| 1188 | .await?; |
| 1189 | Ok(()) |
| 1190 | } |
| 1191 | |
| 1192 | /// Lands a pull request whose head has just moved, if a merge of it was |
| 1193 | /// waiting for exactly that. What it was caught up to was already |
| 1194 | /// checked and reviewed apart from the merge, so the checks are not |
| 1195 | /// waited for again; a repository that wants them rerun turns on |
| 1196 | /// "require up to date", and then nothing is landed this way. |
| 1197 | pub(crate) async fn land_if_requested(&self, pull_id: &str) -> Result<()> { |
| 1198 | let Some(request) = self.land_request(pull_id).await? else { |
| 1199 | return Ok(()); |
| 1200 | }; |
| 1201 | self.forget_landing(pull_id).await?; |
| 1202 | let Some(pull) = self.pull_by_id(pull_id).await? else { |
| 1203 | return Ok(()); |
| 1204 | }; |
| 1205 | let repo: Outcome<Repo> = g1t_kit::call( |
| 1206 | &self.repos, |
| 1207 | "get_by_id", |
| 1208 | &GetByIdArgs { |
| 1209 | id: pull.repo_id.clone(), |
| 1210 | viewer: Some(request.actor.clone()), |
| 1211 | }, |
| 1212 | ) |
| 1213 | .await?; |
| 1214 | let Outcome::Ok(repo) = crate::retired::unless_archived(repo) else { |
| 1215 | return Ok(()); |
| 1216 | }; |
| 1217 | let merged = self |
| 1218 | .merge_pull(PullActionArgs { |
| 1219 | actor: request.actor, |
| 1220 | repo: RepoPath { |
| 1221 | namespace: repo.namespace, |
| 1222 | name: repo.name, |
| 1223 | }, |
| 1224 | number: pull.number, |
| 1225 | summary: String::new(), |
| 1226 | keep_issue_open: request.keep_issue_open, |
| 1227 | ignore_checks: true, |
| 1228 | }) |
| 1229 | .await?; |
| 1230 | if let Outcome::Fail(failure) = merged { |
| 1231 | self.stall(StallArgs { |
| 1232 | pull_id: pull.id, |
| 1233 | reason: format!( |
| 1234 | "It was brought up to date but could not be merged: {}", |
| 1235 | failure.message |
| 1236 | ), |
| 1237 | }) |
| 1238 | .await?; |
| 1239 | } |
| 1240 | Ok(()) |
| 1241 | } |
| 1242 | |
| 1243 | /// What the runner needs to bring a pull request up to date for a merge |
| 1244 | /// that is waiting on it. |
| 1245 | pub(crate) async fn catch_up_job(&self, a: CatchUpJobArgs) -> Result<Option<LifecycleJob>> { |
| 1246 | if self.land_request(&a.pull_id).await?.is_none() { |
| 1247 | return Ok(None); |
| 1248 | } |
| 1249 | let Some(pull) = self.pull_by_id(&a.pull_id).await? else { |
| 1250 | return Ok(None); |
| 1251 | }; |
| 1252 | // Its author can read both the repository and the pull request's source. |
| 1253 | let repo: Outcome<Repo> = g1t_kit::call( |
| 1254 | &self.repos, |
| 1255 | "get_by_id", |
| 1256 | &GetByIdArgs { |
| 1257 | id: pull.repo_id.clone(), |
| 1258 | viewer: self.author_viewer(&pull).await?, |
| 1259 | }, |
| 1260 | ) |
| 1261 | .await?; |
| 1262 | let Outcome::Ok(repo) = crate::retired::unless_archived(repo) else { |
| 1263 | return Ok(None); |
| 1264 | }; |
| 1265 | let path = RepoPath { |
| 1266 | namespace: repo.namespace, |
| 1267 | name: repo.name, |
| 1268 | }; |
| 1269 | let issue = match pull.issue { |
| 1270 | Some(number) => self.issue(&pull.repo_id, number).await?, |
| 1271 | None => None, |
| 1272 | }; |
| 1273 | let feedback = self.conflict_note(&pull, &repo.default_branch).await?; |
| 1274 | Ok(Some(LifecycleJob { |
| 1275 | pull_id: pull.id, |
| 1276 | source: pull.fork.unwrap_or_else(|| path.clone()), |
| 1277 | repo: path, |
| 1278 | number: pull.number, |
| 1279 | author: pull.author, |
| 1280 | branch: pull.branch, |
| 1281 | default_branch: repo.default_branch, |
| 1282 | title: pull.title, |
| 1283 | description: pull.body.unwrap_or_default(), |
| 1284 | issue, |
| 1285 | feedback, |
| 1286 | round: 0, |
| 1287 | })) |
| 1288 | } |
| 1289 | |
| 1290 | /// For an agent catching up: the files g1t already knows conflict, so |
| 1291 | /// it reads them first. Empty when none are known. |
| 1292 | pub(crate) async fn conflict_note(&self, pull: &Pull, default_branch: &str) -> Result<String> { |
| 1293 | Ok(match self.conflicting_files(pull).await? { |
| 1294 | Some(files) if !files.is_empty() => format!( |
| 1295 | "g1t found ahead of time that merging {default_branch} into this pull request conflicts in these files: {}.", |
| 1296 | files.join(", ") |
| 1297 | ), |
| 1298 | _ => String::new(), |
| 1299 | }) |
| 1300 | } |
| 1301 | |
| 1302 | pub(crate) async fn stall(&self, a: StallArgs) -> Result<bool> { |
| 1303 | self.db |
| 1304 | .prepare( |
| 1305 | "UPDATE pulls |
| 1306 | SET stalled = ?, working_on = NULL, working_until = NULL, |
| 1307 | land_requested = NULL, land_requested_at = NULL |
| 1308 | WHERE id = ? AND status = 'open'", |
| 1309 | ) |
| 1310 | .bind(&[a.reason.trim().into(), a.pull_id.as_str().into()])? |
| 1311 | .run() |
| 1312 | .await?; |
| 1313 | self.db |
| 1314 | .prepare("UPDATE pulls SET stage = 'needs_you', stage_detail = ? WHERE id = ?") |
| 1315 | .bind(&[a.reason.trim().into(), a.pull_id.into()])? |
| 1316 | .run() |
| 1317 | .await?; |
| 1318 | Ok(true) |
| 1319 | } |
| 1320 | |
| 1321 | pub(crate) async fn managed_pulls(&self, a: ManagedPullsArgs) -> Result<Vec<String>> { |
| 1322 | let rows = self |
| 1323 | .db |
| 1324 | .prepare( |
| 1325 | "SELECT id AS value FROM pulls |
| 1326 | WHERE status = 'open' AND managed = 1 AND stalled IS NULL |
| 1327 | AND (?1 IS NULL OR repo_id = ?1) |
| 1328 | ORDER BY updated_at DESC LIMIT ?2", |
| 1329 | ) |
| 1330 | .bind(&[ |
| 1331 | a.repo_id.map_or(JsValue::NULL, JsValue::from), |
| 1332 | MANAGED_PAGE.into(), |
| 1333 | ])? |
| 1334 | .all() |
| 1335 | .await? |
| 1336 | .results::<ValueRow>()?; |
| 1337 | Ok(rows.into_iter().map(|row| row.value).collect()) |
| 1338 | } |
| 1339 | } |
| 1340 | |
| 1341 | #[cfg(test)] |
| 1342 | mod tests { |
| 1343 | use super::*; |
| 1344 | |
| 1345 | const MAX_REVISIONS: u32 = 2; |
| 1346 | |
| 1347 | #[test] |
| 1348 | fn approvals_the_repository_wants_are_waited_for() { |
| 1349 | let short = || Facts { |
| 1350 | review: reviewed(Some(Verdict::Approve)), |
| 1351 | approvals_missing: Some("This repository requires 1 approving review.".to_owned()), |
| 1352 | ..facts() |
| 1353 | }; |
| 1354 | let (lifecycle, next) = decide(short()); |
| 1355 | assert_eq!(lifecycle.stage, Stage::NeedsYou); |
| 1356 | assert_eq!( |
| 1357 | lifecycle.detail, |
| 1358 | "This repository requires 1 approving review." |
| 1359 | ); |
| 1360 | assert!(matches!(next, Next::Wait)); |
| 1361 | // Not even a repository that merges by itself merges without them. |
| 1362 | let automatic = Facts { |
| 1363 | auto_merge: true, |
| 1364 | ..short() |
| 1365 | }; |
| 1366 | assert_eq!(outcome(automatic), (Stage::NeedsYou, "wait")); |
| 1367 | } |
| 1368 | |
| 1369 | #[test] |
| 1370 | fn a_repository_can_leave_review_to_people() { |
| 1371 | let unreviewed = Facts { |
| 1372 | agent_review: false, |
| 1373 | ..facts() |
| 1374 | }; |
| 1375 | assert_eq!(outcome(unreviewed), (Stage::Ready, "wait")); |
| 1376 | let failing = Facts { |
| 1377 | agent_review: false, |
| 1378 | check_status: Some(CheckStatus::Failed), |
| 1379 | ..facts() |
| 1380 | }; |
| 1381 | assert_eq!(outcome(failing), (Stage::Revising, "revise for checks")); |
| 1382 | } |
| 1383 | |
| 1384 | #[test] |
| 1385 | fn a_repository_sets_how_often_the_author_is_sent_back() { |
| 1386 | let never = Facts { |
| 1387 | max_revisions: 0, |
| 1388 | check_status: Some(CheckStatus::Failed), |
| 1389 | ..facts() |
| 1390 | }; |
| 1391 | assert_eq!(outcome(never), (Stage::NeedsYou, "wait")); |
| 1392 | } |
| 1393 | |
| 1394 | /// Checks on a head commit: `(context, state)` statuses, against the |
| 1395 | /// required check names. |
| 1396 | fn checks(statuses: &[(&str, &str)], required: &[&str]) -> WorkflowFacts { |
| 1397 | let statuses: Vec<CommitStatus> = statuses |
| 1398 | .iter() |
| 1399 | .map(|(context, state)| CommitStatus { |
| 1400 | context: (*context).to_owned(), |
| 1401 | state: (*state).to_owned(), |
| 1402 | description: None, |
| 1403 | target_url: None, |
| 1404 | updated_at: String::new(), |
| 1405 | }) |
| 1406 | .collect(); |
| 1407 | let required: Vec<String> = required.iter().map(|name| (*name).to_owned()).collect(); |
| 1408 | WorkflowFacts::of(&statuses, &required) |
| 1409 | } |
| 1410 | |
| 1411 | /// A pull request that is ready for review, whose required check |
| 1412 | /// passed, and nothing else yet. |
| 1413 | fn facts() -> Facts { |
| 1414 | Facts { |
| 1415 | draft: false, |
| 1416 | stalled: None, |
| 1417 | working_on: None, |
| 1418 | check_status: None, |
| 1419 | review_pending: false, |
| 1420 | revisions: 0, |
| 1421 | review: None, |
| 1422 | behind: false, |
| 1423 | conflicting: false, |
| 1424 | auto_merge: false, |
| 1425 | require_up_to_date: false, |
| 1426 | agent_review: true, |
| 1427 | max_revisions: MAX_REVISIONS, |
| 1428 | approvals_missing: None, |
| 1429 | person_request: None, |
| 1430 | queued: None, |
| 1431 | workflows: checks(&[("CI / pull_request", "success")], &["CI"]), |
| 1432 | low_confidence: None, |
| 1433 | } |
| 1434 | } |
| 1435 | |
| 1436 | #[test] |
| 1437 | fn failed_checks_send_the_agent_back_and_running_ones_wait() { |
| 1438 | let failed = Facts { |
| 1439 | workflows: checks(&[("CI / pull_request", "failure")], &["CI"]), |
| 1440 | ..facts() |
| 1441 | }; |
| 1442 | let (lifecycle, next) = decide(failed); |
| 1443 | assert!(matches!(next, Next::Revise(Feedback::FailedWorkflows))); |
| 1444 | assert!(lifecycle.detail.contains("CI / pull_request failed")); |
| 1445 | let running = Facts { |
| 1446 | workflows: checks(&[("CI / pull_request", "pending")], &["CI"]), |
| 1447 | ..facts() |
| 1448 | }; |
| 1449 | let (lifecycle, next) = decide(running); |
| 1450 | assert!(matches!(next, Next::Wait)); |
| 1451 | assert!(lifecycle.detail.contains("Waiting for CI / pull_request")); |
| 1452 | } |
| 1453 | |
| 1454 | #[test] |
| 1455 | fn a_check_the_branch_does_not_require_is_fixed_but_does_not_hold_it_for_ever() { |
| 1456 | // Lint is not required: the agent is still sent back to fix it... |
| 1457 | let lint = checks(&[("CI / pull_request", "success"), ("Lint / pull_request", "failure")], &["CI"]); |
| 1458 | let failing = Facts { workflows: lint.clone(), ..facts() }; |
| 1459 | assert_eq!(outcome(failing), (Stage::Revising, "revise for workflows")); |
| 1460 | // ...but once it is out of revisions, Lint no longer holds it. |
| 1461 | let exhausted = Facts { |
| 1462 | workflows: lint, |
| 1463 | revisions: MAX_REVISIONS, |
| 1464 | review: reviewed(Some(Verdict::Approve)), |
| 1465 | ..facts() |
| 1466 | }; |
| 1467 | assert_eq!(outcome(exhausted), (Stage::Ready, "wait")); |
| 1468 | // A required check that still fails asks a person. |
| 1469 | let required = Facts { |
| 1470 | workflows: checks(&[("CI / pull_request", "failure")], &["CI"]), |
| 1471 | revisions: MAX_REVISIONS, |
| 1472 | ..facts() |
| 1473 | }; |
| 1474 | let (lifecycle, next) = decide(required); |
| 1475 | assert_eq!(lifecycle.stage, Stage::NeedsYou); |
| 1476 | assert_eq!(lifecycle.detail, "The required check CI still fails after the agent revised twice."); |
| 1477 | assert!(matches!(next, Next::Wait)); |
| 1478 | } |
| 1479 | |
| 1480 | #[test] |
| 1481 | fn a_required_check_that_has_not_reported_is_waited_for() { |
| 1482 | let missing = Facts { |
| 1483 | workflows: checks(&[("CI / pull_request", "success")], &["CI", "Deploy"]), |
| 1484 | review: reviewed(Some(Verdict::Approve)), |
| 1485 | auto_merge: true, |
| 1486 | ..facts() |
| 1487 | }; |
| 1488 | let (lifecycle, next) = decide(missing); |
| 1489 | assert_eq!(lifecycle.stage, Stage::Checking); |
| 1490 | assert_eq!(lifecycle.detail, "Waiting for the required check Deploy to report on its latest commit."); |
| 1491 | assert!(matches!(next, Next::Wait), "auto-merge must not land it"); |
| 1492 | } |
| 1493 | |
| 1494 | #[test] |
| 1495 | fn a_queued_pull_request_waits_in_the_queue() { |
| 1496 | let queued = Facts { |
| 1497 | review: reviewed(Some(Verdict::Approve)), |
| 1498 | queued: Some((QueueState::Testing, vec![12, 14])), |
| 1499 | auto_merge: true, |
| 1500 | ..facts() |
| 1501 | }; |
| 1502 | let (lifecycle, next) = decide(queued); |
| 1503 | assert_eq!(lifecycle.stage, Stage::Queued); |
| 1504 | assert!(lifecycle.detail.contains("#12, #14")); |
| 1505 | assert!(matches!(next, Next::Wait)); |
| 1506 | } |
| 1507 | |
| 1508 | fn asked_by_a_person() -> Option<PersonRequest> { |
| 1509 | Some(PersonRequest { |
| 1510 | author_id: "usr_reviewer".to_owned(), |
| 1511 | author_name: "g1t-reviewer".to_owned(), |
| 1512 | created_at: "2026-10-02T11:00:00.000Z".to_owned(), |
| 1513 | }) |
| 1514 | } |
| 1515 | |
| 1516 | #[test] |
| 1517 | fn a_person_asking_for_changes_sends_the_agent_back() { |
| 1518 | let asked = Facts { |
| 1519 | review: reviewed(Some(Verdict::Approve)), |
| 1520 | approvals_missing: Some("A reviewer has asked for changes.".to_owned()), |
| 1521 | person_request: asked_by_a_person(), |
| 1522 | ..facts() |
| 1523 | }; |
| 1524 | let (lifecycle, _) = decide(Facts { |
| 1525 | person_request: asked_by_a_person(), |
| 1526 | ..facts() |
| 1527 | }); |
| 1528 | assert!(lifecycle.detail.starts_with("g1t-reviewer asked for changes")); |
| 1529 | assert_eq!(outcome(asked), (Stage::Revising, "revise for a person")); |
| 1530 | } |
| 1531 | |
| 1532 | #[test] |
| 1533 | fn a_person_is_asked_once_the_revisions_run_out() { |
| 1534 | let exhausted = Facts { |
| 1535 | person_request: asked_by_a_person(), |
| 1536 | revisions: MAX_REVISIONS, |
| 1537 | ..facts() |
| 1538 | }; |
| 1539 | assert_eq!(outcome(exhausted), (Stage::NeedsYou, "wait")); |
| 1540 | } |
| 1541 | |
| 1542 | fn reviewed(verdict: Option<Verdict>) -> Option<FinishedReview> { |
| 1543 | Some(FinishedReview { |
| 1544 | finished_at: "2026-10-02T10:00:00.000Z".to_owned(), |
| 1545 | verdict, |
| 1546 | }) |
| 1547 | } |
| 1548 | |
| 1549 | /// The stage, and a word for the step to take. |
| 1550 | fn outcome(facts: Facts) -> (Stage, &'static str) { |
| 1551 | let (lifecycle, next) = decide(facts); |
| 1552 | let step = match next { |
| 1553 | Next::Wait => "wait", |
| 1554 | Next::Review => "review", |
| 1555 | Next::Revise(Feedback::FailedChecks) => "revise for checks", |
| 1556 | Next::Revise(Feedback::FailedWorkflows) => "revise for workflows", |
| 1557 | Next::Revise(Feedback::Review(_)) => "revise for review", |
| 1558 | Next::Revise(Feedback::Person(_)) => "revise for a person", |
| 1559 | Next::CatchUp => "catch up", |
| 1560 | Next::Merge => "merge", |
| 1561 | }; |
| 1562 | (lifecycle.stage, step) |
| 1563 | } |
| 1564 | |
| 1565 | #[test] |
| 1566 | fn nothing_is_started_while_the_agent_is_still_working() { |
| 1567 | let draft = Facts { |
| 1568 | draft: true, |
| 1569 | check_status: None, |
| 1570 | ..facts() |
| 1571 | }; |
| 1572 | assert_eq!(outcome(draft), (Stage::Working, "wait")); |
| 1573 | } |
| 1574 | |
| 1575 | #[test] |
| 1576 | fn checks_come_before_review() { |
| 1577 | let unchecked = Facts { |
| 1578 | workflows: checks(&[], &["CI"]), |
| 1579 | ..facts() |
| 1580 | }; |
| 1581 | assert_eq!(outcome(unchecked), (Stage::Checking, "wait")); |
| 1582 | let running = Facts { |
| 1583 | workflows: checks(&[("CI / pull_request", "pending")], &["CI"]), |
| 1584 | ..facts() |
| 1585 | }; |
| 1586 | assert_eq!(outcome(running), (Stage::Checking, "wait")); |
| 1587 | assert_eq!(outcome(facts()), (Stage::Reviewing, "review")); |
| 1588 | } |
| 1589 | |
| 1590 | #[test] |
| 1591 | fn a_branch_that_requires_no_checks_goes_straight_to_review() { |
| 1592 | let unchecked = Facts { |
| 1593 | workflows: WorkflowFacts::default(), |
| 1594 | ..facts() |
| 1595 | }; |
| 1596 | assert_eq!(outcome(unchecked), (Stage::Reviewing, "review")); |
| 1597 | } |
| 1598 | |
| 1599 | #[test] |
| 1600 | fn failing_in_the_merge_queue_sends_the_author_back() { |
| 1601 | let failed = Facts { |
| 1602 | check_status: Some(CheckStatus::Failed), |
| 1603 | ..facts() |
| 1604 | }; |
| 1605 | let (lifecycle, next) = decide(failed); |
| 1606 | assert_eq!(lifecycle.detail, "It failed in the merge queue. The agent is being sent back to fix it."); |
| 1607 | assert!(matches!(next, Next::Revise(Feedback::FailedChecks))); |
| 1608 | } |
| 1609 | |
| 1610 | #[test] |
| 1611 | fn checks_that_could_not_run_are_a_persons_problem() { |
| 1612 | let errored = Facts { |
| 1613 | check_status: Some(CheckStatus::Errored), |
| 1614 | ..facts() |
| 1615 | }; |
| 1616 | assert_eq!(outcome(errored), (Stage::NeedsYou, "wait")); |
| 1617 | } |
| 1618 | |
| 1619 | #[test] |
| 1620 | fn a_review_asking_for_changes_sends_the_author_back() { |
| 1621 | let changes = Facts { |
| 1622 | review: reviewed(Some(Verdict::RequestChanges)), |
| 1623 | ..facts() |
| 1624 | }; |
| 1625 | assert_eq!(outcome(changes), (Stage::Revising, "revise for review")); |
| 1626 | } |
| 1627 | |
| 1628 | #[test] |
| 1629 | fn the_author_is_sent_back_only_so_many_times() { |
| 1630 | let failing = Facts { |
| 1631 | check_status: Some(CheckStatus::Failed), |
| 1632 | revisions: MAX_REVISIONS, |
| 1633 | ..facts() |
| 1634 | }; |
| 1635 | assert_eq!(outcome(failing), (Stage::NeedsYou, "wait")); |
| 1636 | let unconvinced = Facts { |
| 1637 | review: reviewed(Some(Verdict::RequestChanges)), |
| 1638 | revisions: MAX_REVISIONS, |
| 1639 | ..facts() |
| 1640 | }; |
| 1641 | assert_eq!(outcome(unconvinced), (Stage::NeedsYou, "wait")); |
| 1642 | // One short of the limit still gets another go. |
| 1643 | let once = Facts { |
| 1644 | check_status: Some(CheckStatus::Failed), |
| 1645 | revisions: MAX_REVISIONS - 1, |
| 1646 | ..facts() |
| 1647 | }; |
| 1648 | assert_eq!(outcome(once), (Stage::Revising, "revise for checks")); |
| 1649 | } |
| 1650 | |
| 1651 | #[test] |
| 1652 | fn a_review_that_could_not_be_written_is_not_retried() { |
| 1653 | let broken = Facts { |
| 1654 | review: reviewed(None), |
| 1655 | ..facts() |
| 1656 | }; |
| 1657 | assert_eq!(outcome(broken), (Stage::NeedsYou, "wait")); |
| 1658 | } |
| 1659 | |
| 1660 | #[test] |
| 1661 | fn being_behind_only_holds_a_change_up_where_the_repository_says_so() { |
| 1662 | let behind = || Facts { |
| 1663 | review: reviewed(Some(Verdict::Approve)), |
| 1664 | behind: true, |
| 1665 | ..facts() |
| 1666 | }; |
| 1667 | // By default it is ready as it is; merging brings it up to date. |
| 1668 | assert_eq!(outcome(behind()), (Stage::Ready, "wait")); |
| 1669 | let strict = Facts { |
| 1670 | require_up_to_date: true, |
| 1671 | ..behind() |
| 1672 | }; |
| 1673 | assert_eq!(outcome(strict), (Stage::CatchingUp, "catch up")); |
| 1674 | let current = Facts { |
| 1675 | review: reviewed(Some(Verdict::Approve)), |
| 1676 | ..facts() |
| 1677 | }; |
| 1678 | assert_eq!(outcome(current), (Stage::Ready, "wait")); |
| 1679 | } |
| 1680 | |
| 1681 | #[test] |
| 1682 | fn a_ready_change_lands_by_itself_only_where_the_repository_says_so() { |
| 1683 | let ready = || Facts { |
| 1684 | review: reviewed(Some(Verdict::Approve)), |
| 1685 | ..facts() |
| 1686 | }; |
| 1687 | assert_eq!(outcome(ready()), (Stage::Ready, "wait")); |
| 1688 | let automatic = Facts { |
| 1689 | auto_merge: true, |
| 1690 | ..ready() |
| 1691 | }; |
| 1692 | assert_eq!(outcome(automatic), (Stage::Ready, "merge")); |
| 1693 | // One that is behind is merged too: merging brings it up to date. |
| 1694 | let behind = Facts { |
| 1695 | auto_merge: true, |
| 1696 | behind: true, |
| 1697 | ..ready() |
| 1698 | }; |
| 1699 | assert_eq!(outcome(behind), (Stage::Ready, "merge")); |
| 1700 | // Unless the repository wants it caught up and checked again first. |
| 1701 | let strict = Facts { |
| 1702 | auto_merge: true, |
| 1703 | behind: true, |
| 1704 | require_up_to_date: true, |
| 1705 | ..ready() |
| 1706 | }; |
| 1707 | assert_eq!(outcome(strict), (Stage::CatchingUp, "catch up")); |
| 1708 | // Nothing short of approved is merged, whatever the setting. |
| 1709 | let failing = Facts { |
| 1710 | auto_merge: true, |
| 1711 | check_status: Some(CheckStatus::Failed), |
| 1712 | ..ready() |
| 1713 | }; |
| 1714 | assert_eq!(outcome(failing), (Stage::Revising, "revise for checks")); |
| 1715 | let unreviewed = Facts { |
| 1716 | auto_merge: true, |
| 1717 | ..facts() |
| 1718 | }; |
| 1719 | assert_eq!(outcome(unreviewed), (Stage::Reviewing, "review")); |
| 1720 | } |
| 1721 | |
| 1722 | #[test] |
| 1723 | fn a_conflict_found_ahead_of_time_is_resolved_before_merging() { |
| 1724 | let conflicting = || Facts { |
| 1725 | review: reviewed(Some(Verdict::Approve)), |
| 1726 | behind: true, |
| 1727 | conflicting: true, |
| 1728 | ..facts() |
| 1729 | }; |
| 1730 | // Even where the repository would merge one that is merely behind. |
| 1731 | assert_eq!(outcome(conflicting()), (Stage::CatchingUp, "catch up")); |
| 1732 | let automatic = Facts { |
| 1733 | auto_merge: true, |
| 1734 | ..conflicting() |
| 1735 | }; |
| 1736 | assert_eq!(outcome(automatic), (Stage::CatchingUp, "catch up")); |
| 1737 | // Failed checks come first: a revision merges the branch in too. |
| 1738 | let failing = Facts { |
| 1739 | check_status: Some(CheckStatus::Failed), |
| 1740 | ..conflicting() |
| 1741 | }; |
| 1742 | assert_eq!(outcome(failing), (Stage::Revising, "revise for checks")); |
| 1743 | } |
| 1744 | |
| 1745 | #[test] |
| 1746 | fn catching_up_reruns_the_checks_but_not_the_review() { |
| 1747 | // The merge moved the head, so the checks are waited for again. |
| 1748 | let merged_in = Facts { |
| 1749 | review: reviewed(Some(Verdict::Approve)), |
| 1750 | workflows: checks(&[], &["CI"]), |
| 1751 | ..facts() |
| 1752 | }; |
| 1753 | assert_eq!(outcome(merged_in), (Stage::Checking, "wait")); |
| 1754 | } |
| 1755 | |
| 1756 | #[test] |
| 1757 | fn a_step_under_way_is_not_started_again() { |
| 1758 | for (step, stage) in [ |
| 1759 | ("review", Stage::Reviewing), |
| 1760 | ("revision", Stage::Revising), |
| 1761 | ("catch_up", Stage::CatchingUp), |
| 1762 | ] { |
| 1763 | let busy = Facts { |
| 1764 | working_on: Some(step.to_owned()), |
| 1765 | // Whatever else is true, the step in hand comes first. |
| 1766 | check_status: Some(CheckStatus::Failed), |
| 1767 | ..facts() |
| 1768 | }; |
| 1769 | assert_eq!(outcome(busy), (stage, "wait")); |
| 1770 | } |
| 1771 | let asked = Facts { |
| 1772 | review_pending: true, |
| 1773 | ..facts() |
| 1774 | }; |
| 1775 | assert_eq!(outcome(asked), (Stage::Reviewing, "wait")); |
| 1776 | } |
| 1777 | |
| 1778 | #[test] |
| 1779 | fn a_low_confidence_change_waits_for_a_person_instead_of_merging() { |
| 1780 | let held = || Facts { |
| 1781 | review: reviewed(Some(Verdict::Approve)), |
| 1782 | auto_merge: true, |
| 1783 | low_confidence: Some("tests not added, 3 revisions".to_owned()), |
| 1784 | ..facts() |
| 1785 | }; |
| 1786 | let (lifecycle, next) = decide(held()); |
| 1787 | assert_eq!(lifecycle.stage, Stage::NeedsYou); |
| 1788 | assert!(matches!(next, Next::Wait), "auto-merge must not land it"); |
| 1789 | assert_eq!( |
| 1790 | lifecycle.detail, |
| 1791 | "The agent's confidence in this change is low (tests not added, 3 revisions). This repository asks a person before merging it: approve it to let it land, or ask for changes." |
| 1792 | ); |
| 1793 | // Without auto-merge it needs someone too, and says why. |
| 1794 | assert_eq!(outcome(Facts { auto_merge: false, ..held() }), (Stage::NeedsYou, "wait")); |
| 1795 | // Not held (the setting is off, or a person approved): it lands. |
| 1796 | assert_eq!(outcome(Facts { low_confidence: None, ..held() }), (Stage::Ready, "merge")); |
| 1797 | // It holds only a change that is otherwise ready: what comes first, |
| 1798 | // such as failed checks, is still dealt with first. |
| 1799 | let failing = Facts { |
| 1800 | check_status: Some(CheckStatus::Failed), |
| 1801 | ..held() |
| 1802 | }; |
| 1803 | assert_eq!(outcome(failing), (Stage::Revising, "revise for checks")); |
| 1804 | let unapproved = Facts { |
| 1805 | approvals_missing: Some("This repository requires 1 approving review.".to_owned()), |
| 1806 | ..held() |
| 1807 | }; |
| 1808 | assert_eq!(decide(unapproved).0.detail, "This repository requires 1 approving review."); |
| 1809 | } |
| 1810 | |
| 1811 | #[test] |
| 1812 | fn once_stopped_it_stays_stopped() { |
| 1813 | let (lifecycle, next) = decide(Facts { |
| 1814 | stalled: Some("The agent could not catch up.".to_owned()), |
| 1815 | review: reviewed(Some(Verdict::Approve)), |
| 1816 | behind: true, |
| 1817 | ..facts() |
| 1818 | }); |
| 1819 | assert_eq!(lifecycle.stage, Stage::NeedsYou); |
| 1820 | assert_eq!(lifecycle.detail, "The agent could not catch up."); |
| 1821 | assert!(matches!(next, Next::Wait)); |
| 1822 | } |
| 1823 | } |